Wake up（46）

 

46

 

Zhang San was responsible for collecting information on "violent law enforcement" by various urban management thugs, and notified Nan Yunshan, Li Si, and Wang Wu. These four youths of the same age formed the Three Zs in private, and analyzed the situation before preparing to take action against the thugs in the urban management.

On the morning of April 19, 2020, several urban management officers in Cangnan County, Wenzhou City, Zhejiang Province had a dispute with a female vegetable vendor. A passing man took a photo with his mobile phone. After being spotted by the urban management staff, he rushed to intercept and beat the man. As a result, he fell to the ground and vomited blood, which aroused the surrounding crowd to watch. According to a Xinhuanet report on the 19th, as the onlookers gathered after hearing the news, the scene was chaotic. Not only urban management vehicles were smashed, but five urban management personnel were also besieged and beaten. After being sent to the hospital for diagnosis, 2 urban management staff suffered from traumatic hemorrhagic shock. They are currently in critical condition and are being rescued; 3 staff members have multiple soft tissue injuries and are receiving treatment.

In this regard, an article on the Internet commented that thanks to the popularity of mobile new media, the entire incident was broadcast live online almost in real time. The man surnamed Huang who was injured by the chengguan was seriously injured, but the chengguan who was beaten by the public was even more serious and his life was in danger. In recent years, violent incidents of urban management have emerged one after another, sometimes resulting in serious consequences of death. And the domineering objects of urban management are obviously far more than vendors. Onlookers may be beaten by urban management if they say something fair, take pictures with their mobile phones, or even suspect that they use their mobile phones to take pictures.

But even though people were killed, there were almost no reports of the parties being held criminally responsible, and more of them were internally downplayed. This is also inseparable from the current general environment. When mass incidents or negative incidents occur, local governments often do not follow the legal procedures to deal with the aftermath. Instead, in the name of maintaining stability or maintaining the local image, they shield the parties and use huge financial funds. They used both soft and hard tactics to bribe the victim's family members to calm down the situation. This in turn connives at the city management's bad style of violent law enforcement, forming a vicious circle.

In the Cangnan incident, there is another noteworthy detail, that is: when they discovered that the urban management team members were violently enforcing the law, some citizens first thought of taking out their mobile phones to take pictures and posting them online, instead of calling 110 to call the police. The reason is obviously in the subconscious mind. When it comes to chengguan wounding or seeking help for rights protection, the public believes that sending messages online is more effective than calling the police. There is a saying on the Internet: Appealing is not as good as petitioning, and petitioning is not as good as surfing the Internet. This also reflects the serious lack of public confidence in Chinese law.

Another online article said that it is not uncommon for urban management to beat people. It may be that "violent law enforcement" and "big fights" are used to it. Consequences of restraint. The so-called "If you don't fight for three days, you will go to the house to expose the tiles." At first glance, unfettered power, the more power, the more powerful. The common people, on the other hand, always seem to be the vulnerable group. But under certain conditions, this balance of power will also change.

Nan Yunshan said about the Cangnan chengguan beating incident: In the beginning, the chengguan "relyed on power", and several people could easily knock the other person to the ground, or even step on another foot, so that he would never stand up again. But it couldn't stand the difficulty of one person, and nearly a thousand people flocked to support him from all directions. At this time, even if the urban management is "fully armed", after all, "the power is weak", and the vicious tiger is still afraid of the wolves. This is called "many people are powerful", "many people gather firewood and flames are high". The ancients of China have long said that "the ones who get the right way get more help, but those who lose the right way get little help"; "Water can carry a boat, but it can also capsize it". In this regard, those Wenzhou Cangnan urban management must have the deepest experience. Surrounded by the masses, in the "ocean" of the masses, these urban management officers are really "a drop in the ocean" and "vulnerable to a single blow."

Li Si said, I watched CCTV's "News Live Room", and the live surveillance video showed that after the urban management beat people, thousands of people gathered on the street and overturned the ambulance that came to rescue the urban management. The incident was upgraded to "control violence with violence". Who is the urban management working hard for? I remember that on June 4, 2011, a peddler killed a city management officer and was sentenced to death by the court, but the public gave them great sympathy and solidarity. In the more than 10 years of rapid urbanization in China, such stories continue to emerge The new version, the most recent case is the case of Xia Junfeng in Shenyang. On the Internet, the public almost overwhelmingly believed in the evidence in favor of Xia Junfeng presented by the defense lawyer. It is hard to believe that Xia Junfeng was not beaten in the urban management office, but was the active assailant, and the public opinion trial and the court trial were completely separated. When lawyer Teng Biao took over Xia Junfeng's case, it was already at the stage of the second trial. The result of the first trial was the death penalty, which was executed immediately. The result of the second instance was to uphold the original judgment. When preparing his final defense statement, Teng Biao searched the Internet for similar cases, and the results surprised him. From 2000 to the present, there have been endless murders between urban management and hawkers, but most of them were urban management who killed hawkers, and there were detailed records. There were at least 18 cases in which the chengguan beat the peddlers to death. "There has never been a single chengguan who has been sentenced to death." Teng Biao said that chengguan beat citizens to death but received no corresponding penalties or even no sanctions at all. This is also a "social fact shared by chengguan and traders." ". For example, in the Hubei Tianmen Wei Wenhua case where the photographer was besieged and beaten to death because he was filmed brutally enforcing the law, the four criminal urban management officers were sentenced to a maximum of 6 years in prison. After Teng Biao's defense was widely circulated on the Internet, the sharp contrast between the urban management he set up and the hawkers' judicial encounters aroused the resonance of countless netizens.

Coincidentally, at the same time that the verdict of the Xia Junfeng case caused a storm of public opinion, on May 3, in Liaoyang, another city not far from Shenyang, another murder case occurred between the urban management and the person being enforced. The enforced were dead.

From Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, Shenyang to those small counties that have just entered the threshold of urbanization, violent incidents in urban management law enforcement occur almost every year in cities large and small in China. What makes this city The orderly urban management system has turned into a life-and-death war between urban management and hawkers? What makes this kind of street violence happen again and again, but has never attracted the attention of reformers? Can the death of an individual and the anger of a group shake this already problematic urban management system?

Four young people who had just turned 18 started a discussion, and there were also different views in the discussion, but they all agreed to "control violence with violence, and never be lenient."