Wake up（377）

 

377

 

For Chinese students who have received red education for a long time, false and true are almost equally effective. They clearly show the belief that true and false are not distinguishable and tend to study courses. They keep a red spoken language or a political guide in mind and repeat it Well, if you imitate well, you can become a successor to communism. This is really a ridiculous way of education. Because every ideological indoctrination of red education is an act of faith, that is, Wei Guangzheng's red education by default cannot be wrong education, but a revolutionary inheritance that does not forget the original intention, and is the continuation of the red gene.

Under this kind of indoctrination and education, young students sang red songs and danced red dances again. They missed the Cultural Revolution they had never experienced, and they also praised the Hu-Wen era that they had not really recognized.

Nan Yangsheng, Ph.D. in Psychology, said:

I grew up in red education, and it was not until after graduation, when I stepped into the society, but was troubled by not being able to find a job, that I began to reflect on my understanding of society. Not long ago, I saw an article written by Su Yunkang: "Mediocrity and Ruthlessness", which called Hu and Wen the kingmakers of Xi Jinping.

The article "Mediocrity and Ruthlessness" says:

Hu Jintao was taken away from the 20th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, and the whole world sympathized with him, but forgot that this was a political drama, and no one was pitiful. In the CCP’s game, it was Hu Jintao who sent Xi Jinping to the throne. That was the political mission of him and Wen Jiabao. For this reason, they purged and persecuted countless people, the most famous of which were Bo Xilai and Liu Xiaobo. opposite. Since Xi Jinping tampered with the constitution and extended his term of office, he has been called the "emperor" by people. The Internet simply gave him the nickname "Xi Huang", so he should have a king-maker. Who is that? Interestingly, the CCP’s king-making was successful only after quelling a "line struggle" and moving to a pretender to the throne. The charges they once gave, such as "engaging in the Cultural Revolution", etc., in March 2012 In the middle of the "Two Sessions" in Beijing, big news broke out. At the closing press conference, Wen Jiabao criticized Chongqing Bo Xilai for "engaging in the Cultural Revolution." Bo Xilai was dismissed the next day. This was the biggest internal strife in the CCP since the "June 4th Movement". In 2009, "stability" was broken, and people in Beijing were in panic. Zhou Yongkang soon became the next target of purges. Rumors that he would counterattack and overthrow Hu and Wen are unknown.

During the Hu-Wen era, we were sandwiched between tyrants and princelings, and there was a butcher Deng Xiaoping hiding in the middle. To say it was "moderate" would be better to say "mediocre". It was also a rare ruling team of engineers in the CCP. "Administrative neutral bureaucracy", but in the hands of these old men killed Liu Xiaobo, the peace prize winner, extremely cold-blooded, and this session has also completed a power transfer: from the next generation of Datian to their children, for Xi Jinping This is the key link for the survival and upgrading of a Leninist party. However, Western political science is still ignorant of it. The whole world hates Xi’s regime, but they don’t know where it came from.

"Mediocrity and Ruthlessness" says:

At the same time when Hu Jintao came to power, the United States was governed by Obama, a left-leaning president with a mixed race and a "charisma" flavor. In contrast, China on the other side of the ocean was unusually "mediocre".

The three successors of Mao Zedong, Deng, Jiang, and Hu, actually faded the charisma of their "first emperor" to such an extent that Hu Jintao once again subverted Weber's "magic" in politics by using "mediocrity". Lisma" theory, that is, China can "economically rise" by relying on mediocrity without "charismatic" authority, and only needs "sky-high high-tech to maintain stability."

According to rough statistics, Mao Zedong tossed the Great Leap Forward and the Great Famine, starving 40 million people to death; during the Cultural Revolution, "100 million people" (Ye Jianying), but there was no effective resistance nationwide.

In contrast, over the past 2,000 years, China’s economic growth has exceeded eighth every year, its GDP has become the second largest in the world, and its foreign exchange reserves have ranked first. However, mass incidents have soared year after year, rising to 180,000 in 2010; an average of nearly 500 incidents per day, A major crisis occurs every five days, and the cost of maintaining stability exceeds the cost of defense. It is called the "fourth full-scale civil war". It is probably because the powerful group has hijacked China, 200 families control 200 industries, and the three major livelihood-oriented societies The basic bottom line (education, medical care, law) is pierced, and the Gini coefficient reaches 0.5. The period of social turmoil; the World Bank has predicted that the Chinese economy will collapse without warning. The historical evaluation of Mao, Deng, Jiang, and Hu is quite different. Mao Zedong is a hero, and his heavy blow to China also has a far-reaching impact. Li Zehou once said in the 1980s: "Whether you love it or hate it, praise it or criticize it, Mao Zedong left a far larger figure than any other figure in modern China." "Concluded; some people have also listed Lao Mao, Hitler, and Stalin as the "Three Devils" of the 20th century, but there are many people who hold a distinction between Lao Mao's "merits and crimes".

From Lao Mao to Lao Deng, the "charm" dropped sharply at one time, and it was regarded as "progress", but in fact it was just "disenchantment". Originally, Deng Xiaoping's "economic rescue of the party" was not a "heavenly talent", but he was affected by the "June 4th" massacre that brutally handled the social crisis. His evaluation is more complicated than that of Lao Mao.

Harvard professor Vogel wrote the biographer of Deng Xiaoping, and he did not shy away from saying that "stability" can lead to economic development, and the Tiananmen crackdown is justified. Fang Lizhi retorted: If this is the case, why does the Chinese government still need to spend huge sums of money to "maintain stability"? Another question: Is it permissible to kill people for the sake of stability and economic growth? Can violence be used to take the life of one group to serve the material interests of another group?

Deng Xiaoping appointed two generations of successors who could not escape the responsibility of being the "overlord" for Jiang and Hu's "crimes in power" during the two terms. Therefore, in the end, Deng Xiaoping may not even be able to earn a "coffin" from a "legal" authority. Because in addition to Fang Lizhi's questioning, China has embarked on a "predatory" economic development model, destroying the survival resources of future generations, and this account will eventually come to him.

If we go back to the "charismatic" discourse, you will find that although Deng Xiaoping, who "hidden needles in the cotton", did not dare to "de-Maoize", he definitely ended the "charismatic" rule, and made Chinese politics calm from now on without any suspense. up.

Going further down, the "ruling personality" unexpectedly passed through Jiang Zemin's "clown (funny) type" and finally reached Hu Jintao's "mediocre (Down syndrome) type". It is precisely because of such a path that today, in the boring situation of "passing flowers by beating drums", a Bo Xilai was chosen to be the successor of Mao Zedong. The most astonishing details in this "political drama" actually fell into the nest of "charm" discourse. It turned out that Bo Xilai despised Zhongnanhai's "charmless" and called Hu Jintao "Han Xiandi" and Xi Jinping "Liu Adou". ".

Isn't it normal for the CCP to "disenchant" in the post-Mao era? Can "Mediocrity" Be Stopped? The question itself becomes a "charm". Either the dictator "Charisma", or the administrative neutral bureaucracy, the two cannot be juxtaposed. According to Weber's definition of "bureaucracy", the state apparatus can only be a neutral, effective technical tool that transcends classes and parties. Hu Jintao's face.

This "modernization of the system" was brutally blocked by Deng Xiaoping in the 1980s because he was the "chief architect". In China, everything from the National People's Congress and the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference to the military and the courts are tightly controlled by the ruling party. The paradox is that this outdated state apparatus must continue to be supported by a "charismatic" authority in order to operate, but Deng Xiaoping chose two generations of "mediocre" successors in one go.

The "party-state" machine built by Mao and Deng was not something that Jiang and Hu could play around with unless it "separated the three powers." Therefore, whether the "expressionless" of the state machine should be replaced by Jiang Zemin's winking, or Hu Jintao's dumbfoundedness, it is irrelevant.

Su Xiaokang continued to write in "Mediocrity and Ruthlessness":

Combing the history of the CCP, you will find that "the dragon plants fleas", "charm" will not be inherited, and the "old generation of revolutionaries" must degenerate, and it is also an irresistible "law of history", which is exactly the "hero of Lao Tzu" sung by the Cultural Revolution. The opposite of "a hero" (whether biological or not). why? See the two details below.

After "September 13" Lin Biao crashed and died, Mao Zedong sadly sent Wang Hongwen from Shanghai to Beijing to inherit the rule. Unofficial history said that he wanted Wang to read "Liu Penzi Biography" in "Book of the Later Han". : How could the commander of the "General Division of Industry" understand that Liu Penzi, a cattle-herding boy of Han descent, has anything to do with him? And Lao Mao is rather ridiculing himself: This Wang Hongwen is just a cowherd boy, can the country be handed over to him?

So how did Lao Mao fall in love with Wang Hongwen in the first place? It turned out that in July 1967, when he traveled from Wuhan to Shanghai, he went to the Bund by car late at night, and saw a group of workers holding spears and wearing hard hats standing guard in front of the Shanghai Revolutionary Committee. This conspiracy master was very fascinated by it. It is naive enough to imagine that the rebels can replace the entire bureaucratic system of the Communist Party.

Generally speaking, Mao and Deng's selection of reserves is "to attack one point, not to the rest". Deng Xiaoping was eager for quick success to "get rid of poverty", superstitiously believed in "scientific productivity", ordered the organization department to search for famous college students, and "fat" cadres to become educated. During this period, Chen Pixian recommended Wang Zhaoguo of Harbin Institute of Technology, but Deng Xiaoping only liked him for one thing: during the Cultural Revolution, he "opposed to smashing and looting".

More than 20 years later, the scene of Mao Zedong on the Bund was repeated on Deng Xiaoping, but this time it was in the Zhongnanhai screening room, on the screen of the top-secret internal film specially provided by the Central News Film Studio, in early March 1989. On the streets of Lhasa, the protagonist wears a steel helmet and carries a submachine gun. He is the first secretary of the Party Committee of the Autonomous Region. Deng Xiaoping was greatly impressed, and turned to ask the secretary: Who is this person?

Deng Xiaoping, who suppressed the Tiananmen student movement, no longer had any imagination for "reform", but instead worried about the safety of the country behind him. One night, it was exactly the same, and there was only one "successor standard" left for him: dare to shoot and suppress? The rest is free from discussion. Not to mention that he is still alive, Yang Shangkun has asked to "re-evaluate June 4th"; he is also worried about Jiang Zemin; he wants to choose the one who has shot in Lhasa to be the "crown prince" of the next generation. Maybe this person is mediocre. .

The "June 4th" catastrophe made the CCP's elders fear that the country would be ruined, and there was not much room for "reserve selection". The two generations who were selected, Jiang Zemin and Hu Jintao, stuck to Deng Xiaoping's warning to "absolutely not turn against the West", and indulged xenophobia in the country The trend of thought is rampant, large-scale introduction of foreign capital, internal dismantling of "socialism", transformation of China into a world factory with cheap labor, and recasting the legitimacy of the regime on the basis of "economic take-off" are not unsuccessful. However, the princelings lashed out at each other, saying that after the old man left for more than 20 years, a group of secretaries and eunuchs had tormented the country to a disgrace.

They are scolding the so-called "Tuanpai". This political force did not originate from the charismatic Hu Yaobang, but formed from the later Hu Jintao. If we sort out the variation from Hu Yaobang to the "Hu Qing gang", the "green" ones are called the "Youth League" and the "Tsinghua Gang". Engineers with a background in science and engineering are led by Hu Jintao, the chief helm of the "Hu Qing Gang". Their knowledge structure has improved, but their humanistic quality has declined. However, they are low-key and cautious, and have adopted a series of new stances and fine-tuned policies, such as being friendly to the people and proposing " "harmonious" (coordinated economic and social development), upgrading the "three rural" policy specifications (phasing out agricultural tax and agricultural and forestry special product tax, direct subsidies to agriculture), adopting relatively tolerant public opinion control, canceling the asylum system; however, the policy towards Taiwan has changed to Tougher, and so on. This series of policies has enabled nationalists, left and right wingers, and ordinary people at the bottom to find a "sense of ironing" from their own interests and tendencies, and there is even a "New Deal".

Nan Yangsheng, a Ph.D. in psychology, interpreted "The Cold-blooded and Ruthless of Mediocrity" written by Su Xiaokang, and said with a sigh: We, the generation born after 2000, have not experienced those things, but have read books written by people born in the 50s, 60s and 70s Or articles, we can feel our senior group, in fact, their group psychology has been distorted.

People often say that society is a big stage, but this big stage always only plays those depressing and bloody dramas of power struggle. crime committed. The powerful and powerful on the political stage often arouse the great anger of grassroots audiences, but they are just audiences. After the show is over, they just wait to see the next show start. The ignorant grassroots are always the eager audience in front of the political arena.