216
Pan Guangfu and Chai Jianmin took over the
materials of "Peking University Chronicle" from Zhou Jianguo on the
train from the inland to Shenzhen, including a book "Wind and Rain Unnamed
Lake" published by China Biography Publishing House in 2018. It's Hu
Zongshi. In the book, Hu Zongshi recalled the days when he returned to Peking
University.
Pan Guangfu began to read "The Wind and Rain
Unnamed Lake".
According to the "Peking University
Chronicle" records: During the investigation of the "May 16th"
Movement, the Peking University propaganda team took some students who had
graduated and were assigned to other places back to the school and conducted an
investigation. The exact number is unknown. According to the memories of some
alumni, there are the following:
Hu Zongshi, a 1966 student of the Department of
Physics at Peking University and former leader of the Cultural Revolution
Dynamics Team at Nie Yuanzi School, was assigned to a factory in Baoji, Shaanxi
in 1968, and was taken back to the school for review during the investigation
of the "May 16" Movement.
Hu Zongshi recalled:
In early and mid-January 1971, I was on my
honeymoon with my lover. At my mother-in-law’s house in Nanjing, I received a
telegram from the factory urging me to go back to the factory. On the morning
of February 19th, when I returned to the factory, I knew that Peking University
had come. In the factory security team that night, Li Guixun from Peking
University said to me: "Peking University has something to ask you to go
back." The factory sent Wu Changshun from the cadre section to accompany
Li Guixun to "escort" me on the train to Beijing that night, and
arrived at Peking University around 2 am on the 21st. At 10:00 in the morning,
I moved into Room 211 on the 43rd floor. There were wooden strips on the windows,
and a big slogan on the door read: "Swear to fight the May 16
counter-revolutionary clique to the end!"
The Department of Physics formed a task force of
more than 20 people, including members of the Workers’ Propaganda Team,
students and teachers, the team leader Zhang Wanxiang (formerly Jinggangshan
Corps), and deputy team leader Zhuang Fengyuan (formerly Xinbei University
Commune). At around 9:00 p.m. on February 27, 1971, Yang Zongyou, the
instructor of the Propaganda Team (company instructor of Unit 8341), came to my
room and said, "You have been here for a week, and we have not touched
you. Be careful. In the past, we said that we have 70% of you, but now we can
say that we have 100% of you. Open the window and tell the truth, you are
'5·16' and the backbone. Should you confess or resist? From now on, we will
enter into hand-to-hand combat with you Nie Yuanzi is your unlucky luck. Do you
know her position in the 5•16 Group? She doesn’t need to fill in the form, she
has the right to approve it. Do you think it won’t be found out if the
materials are burned? The form is burned The people are still there. The roster
is burned, and the head of the organization is still there!" Then he said:
"What you do is not good, it belongs to the bourgeoisie, and we belong to
the proletariat. How can the bourgeoisie resist the proletariat? I don't want
you to express your opinion now, you should think about it first and go to
bed."
This night I went to bed after 11 o'clock, more
than two hours earlier than before. I've been sleep deprived for so many days,
I fell asleep when I lay down. Liu Wenzhen (a PLA cadet, platoon leader,
student-maoist activist) of the task force and another person stayed up all
night watching me to see if I tossed and turned. After waking me up at 5 o'clock
the next morning, Liu Wenzhen asked me: "How are you thinking?"
Fortunately, the two words are over. The school leaders said they want to train
you to be a model, and you don't want to give you a chance!"
On March 2, 1971, the propaganda team held a confession
meeting in the auditorium of the office building. Niu Huilin came to the stage
and confessed that he participated in "5·16": "I participated in
5·16 because of Hong Tao's development. I attacked Comrade Jiang Qing, and I
also made anti-military speeches, and fought under the control of Wang, Guan,
and Qi." Niu Huilin's key points Propaganda not to engage in offensive and
defensive alliances, he said: "It is based on private words and is
unreliable. In the past I gave the list to Hong Tao, and now I hand the list to
the workers' propaganda team." After the meeting, the task force asked
What are my thoughts. I said: "The leader of the opposition faction is
5•16, what can I think?"
One day at the end of March 1971, Yang Zongyou came
forward to talk to me again, and he said: "I haven't touched you for a
month, so don't think it's all right. Chairman Mao's policy has always been to
catch everything in one go. This is what we do these days. You are '5•16', you
are not the chief villain, but you are the backbone. No one can escape. You are
against the king, Guan, and Qi? Your opposition to the king, Guan, and Qi is a
big conspiracy. Peking University is caught by Chairman Mao , It is an advanced
model. What is good about it, it is good because it is steady, accurate and
ruthless, and it is accurate when you hit it... ". The following is a
conversation between me and Yang Zongyou.
Yang: How are you?
Me: "Not in the past, not now, and
never."
Yang: "Then someone reported you?"
Me: "Can you confront me?"
Yang: "Confrontation? So where is the policy
to protect whistleblowers?"
Me: "No confrontation, I have no other
choice."
Yang: "You should think about it carefully,
for your personal future and for your family."
Me: "There's nothing to consider."
Yang: "Stop talking?"
Me: "Definitely say no!"
Yang: "Okay, let's see." He slapped the
table and left. At that time, I misunderstood "honest attitude, not
confronting the masses", and admitted cruelly, "I am the backbone of
the Niesun anti-party clique, but I have no conspiracy." Because we are
fighting against the 5·16 counter-revolutionary clique , against Wang, Guan,
and Qi. Although I admitted the "Nie-Sun Anti-Party Group", in the
materials, I have always written the "5•16 Counter-Revolutionary Group"
and "Nie-Sun Anti-Party Group" separately, because they are not the
same thing at all.
On September 9th, 10th, and 11th, 1971, a
department-wide meeting was held to criticize me for three consecutive days.
The venue was 101 of Yijiao. The title on the blackboard was "Throughly
Criticizing Hu Zong's Counter-Revolutionary Crimes".
It was stipulated in advance that I was not allowed
to speak, shout slogans, or raise my hands. They asked me to wait outside the
door first, and after shouting slogans, they said: "Bring Hu Zongshi
up!" They let me enter through the back door (the door at the top of the
lecture theater).
On the 9th, he criticized me for "opposing the
Proletarian Command".
The first one spoke in general terms, and the
second one criticized me for being "anti-Jiang Qing". I was surprised
at the time because the issue was never mentioned. He first talked about how
the 5.16 counter-revolutionary group hated Comrade Jiang Qing in general, and
mentioned me in one thing: I said on March 8, 1968, Jiang Qing said, "Why
do you always catch Wang, Guan, and Qi? Let it go, are there any big ones
behind Wang, Guan, and Qi?" The speaker said: "The liar gave Nie
Yuanzihei instructions to rebel against Vice Premier Xie, but Hu Zongshi blamed
Comrade Jiang Qing." I laughed when I heard this Laughing, turning his
head away.
The third speech criticized me for being anti-Prime
Minister, saying: "Hu Zongshi colluded with a bad leader of an
organization in Hunan to concoct the so-called 007 secret order." He also
spread rumors, saying: "Hu Zongshi got this material and said to Nie
Yuanzi:' Political swindlers like Liu Shaoqi (referring to Chen Boda) say this
material is very important.” When talking about the "memory of the
conversation with Xu Weigang", it is said that it is "in the name of
investigating the situation against the Prime Minister in society, collecting
and sorting out the Prime Minister's black material and reporting it to the
black backstage." , The practice of confusing right and wrong is really
intolerable. I raised my head and said loudly: "I have never turned
against the Prime Minister!" Practitioner Yan Jingkuan ran up and pressed
my head with his hand, and I lifted it up three times in total. The host said:
"Take Hu Zongshi down!" I raised my head, walked quickly, walked
through the crowd, and passed through the aisle. I took a big step, and the two
people following me were trotting.
The second meeting held on the 10th criticized me
as anti-army and incited the masses to fight against the masses.
The so-called anti-army, in the name of "Nie
Yuanzi, Hu Zongshi and his ilk..." put many things on me.
They spread rumors that I was "against the
proletarian revolutionaries of the three armed forces. As early as April 1967,
they said that 'now the rebels in the army are under pressure'." They also
slandered me for "rebelling against the communication soldiers in the
telegraph building." When the meeting was adjourned, they summed up the
experience of the previous meeting and asked me not to go out through the back
door, but through the front door. In this way, I will not pass through the
crowd, lest I demonstrate. After I came back, Zhang Wanxiang and Zhuang
Fengyuan from the task force came to talk to me. I refuted them and said:
"It is said that I said in April 1967 that 'the rebels in the army are
under pressure'. I never said such a thing. The Three Armies'. How is it
possible to say that I was 'anti-communicator in the telegraph building'? The
signal corps supported 'Red Communication' there, and we also supported 'Red
Communication' there."
On the 11th, the third meeting to criticize me
focused on the anti-Wang, Guan, Qi and February countercurrent issues. Opposing
Wang Li, Guan Feng and Wu Chuanqi's group at the grassroots level was a major
move by Peking University under the leadership of Nie Yuanzi. At that time,
this group was in full swing, and opposing them was very risky. On April 10,
1967, when Nie Yuanzi and Sun Peng arrived at Diaoyutai, they met Jiang Qing
and Chen Boda (Qi Benyu was also present), and sued Wang Li and Guan Feng for
"forming a party for private interests, recruiting surrender and accepting
rebellion". In this interview, Jiang Qing said: "Didn't you say hello
long ago? We need to draw a clear political line with Wu Chuanqi." In response
to this sentence, the speaker of the meeting said: "Nie Yuanzi made Jiang
Qing's rumors." Said: "Your opposition to Wang, Guan, and Qi is to
engage in political gambling, relying on a priori theory, and interfering with
Chairman Mao's strategic deployment." Since I was not allowed to speak, I
could only express my disdain with body language.
On the night of September 13, 1971, in a room in
the office building, the school leaders came to talk to me. Participants in
this conversation included three school leaders, one member of the school's
special case team (they all wore military uniforms, their names were not
introduced), and Zhang Wanxiang and Zhuang Fengyuan from the special case team.
They asked me what I thought after three conferences. I said: "About the
issue of the 007 secret order, the material I got only said that Liu Zhijian
had read this material (secret order), and when I saw the material, Liu Zhijian
had already fallen, how could I talk about Chen Boda How important is this
material? Regarding this material, I stated at the time that 'this is a
frame-up against the Prime Minister'."
The school leader said: "You are not against
the Prime Minister? But this material was copied from Qi Benyu's office and
signed your name. What are you talking about?"
I said: "At that time, I handed it over to the
Central Cultural Revolution, not to Qi Benyu. If it was stated that I handed it
over to Qi Benyu, then even though it was in April 1967, I was still anti-Prime
Minister!" "I took the conversation with Xu Weigang How can this be
called anti-premier? Xu Weigang said: "This time, you are on the wrong
team at Peking University, and you are on the side of the prime minister."
It couldn't be more clear. How can you deduce that We are anti-Prime
Minister." I said again: "In mid-May 1967, I went to Zhongnanhai to
tell the Prime Minister's liaison officer in the Ministry of Communications,
'We discovered an anti-Prime Minister group in the society, that is, the League
of Schools and the Normal University The gang formed by Jinggangshan and
others, every time the Prime Minister talked about Yu Qiuli, Li Xiannian, and
Chen Yi, they would come out and sing the opposite...'. This reflects our
attitude towards the Prime Minister.”
A leader said: "It is counter-revolutionary to
say that it is counter-revolutionary. You can't figure it out. Could it be that
counter-thanks are revolutionary?" Hearing this, I said, "Then let me
tell you one more thing." I talked about the conversation with student
Zhou Zhiqiang on July 10. After the talk, someone interrupted: "You said,
'I said that Xie Fuzhi is the general backstage of 5•16.' He said, 'Do you need
to say that? Got it.’ Is that so?” I replied, “That’s right. This conversation,
I assure you with my head, is a word for word.” They asked me, “What is your
purpose in saying this?” I said: "Justify myself." The person in the
school task force said: "The head of the school is looking for you today.
It is a rare opportunity. You should cherish it and don't make any excuses for
yourself." The chief school leader said: "Today you still have to
Save you. Your attitude is very bad. It is unusual in Peking University and
rare in Beijing. We participated in the three-day conference. We sat in the
back and looked at you. I heard that you were arrogant when you were a student.
Arrogant, supercilious. But we still have to follow the party's policy to save
people who can be saved. You are still very young, only in your 30s, and you
can still do something for the people. You have to think about your future and
consider Let’s talk about where to go, and whether to draw a clear line with
the 5.16 counter-revolutionary group.” I didn’t say a word, and after a pause
he said, “We don’t want you to answer right away, think about it after you get
back.”
Afterwards, Zhuang Fengyuan asked me to write
materials about the conversation with Zhou Zhiqiang, and told me that the
materials should only be handed over to him and Zhang Wanxiang.
On the evening of March 30, 1973, I made an
inspection to the masses at the department-wide meeting. After my inspection,
three members of the public (student Xie Dongsheng and teachers Wei Chongde and
Liu Zunxiao) spoke separately, and then Cao Zhipu, the first deputy secretary
of the department's general branch, announced the conclusion: "The review
of Hu Zongshi is over. Today he made a statement to the masses. Inspection, we
think this inspection is still very in-depth, but we have also seen that the
understanding has improved. According to the party's policy of giving way,
according to the spirit of the central government's instructions, the
organization believes that Hu Zongshi was deceived by Nie Yuanzi and made a
political mistake No disciplinary action, no records, no written
conclusions."
Zhang Wanxiang and Zhuang Fengyuan sent me back to
the factory. When I returned to the factory on April 6, 1973, they handed me
over to Zhao Nianshu from the factory cadre department. In front of me, they
talked about their conclusions to the factory leaders, and said: "How did
you treat me before, and how do you still treat me now."
Pan Guang compounded "The Wind and Rain
Unknown Lake", and the author Hu Zongshi recalled the narrative of his
return to Peking University, which made him close his eyes speechlessly.
没有评论:
发表评论