340
Liu
Xiaosheng also talked about the mutual cooperation and cooperation between Chen
Yun and Deng Xiaoping to Lao Pantou and those young people, but also talked
about the contradictions and differences between the two.
In the
early days of reform and opening up, Deng Xiaoping gave Chen Yun great support.
Similarly, Chen Yun also actively cooperated with Deng Xiaoping's important
ideas. For example, Vietnam, which borders my country to the south, has been in
conflict with China and engaged in massive military invasions of neighboring
countries since the late 1970s. In this regard, the Chinese government has
repeatedly issued statements and notes to the country, expressing strong
protest and condemnation. Vietnam, however, ignored all this. Deng Xiaoping
believed that against this kind of arrogance, it is necessary to fight back in
self-defense. He pointed out: "If we do nothing on the Indochina issue, it
will only increase international tensions."
In view
of the great importance of the decision-making of self-defense and counterattack,
for the sake of prudence, he specially asked Chen Yun to consider the pros and
cons from multiple aspects. After repeated consideration, Chen Yun believed
that this decision could be made, and put forward suggestions on the combat
policy.
On
February 14, 1979, the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China issued
a notice on conducting self-defense counterattacks and defending frontier
battles. The self-defense counterattack began on February 17. After our border
guards achieved their intended purpose, they withdrew from the opponent's
border on March 5 and all returned to our country on the 16th. In the early
1990s, Vietnam took the initiative to restore good-neighborly and friendly
relations with my country. Since then, the two countries have put aside their
past differences, continuously enhanced their friendship, and become good
neighbors, good partners, and good brothers again.
Another
example of Chen Yun's close cooperation with Deng Xiaoping was manifested in
the drafting of the "Resolution on Certain Issues Concerning the Party's
History Since the Founding of the People's Republic of China". After the
Third Plenary Session of the Eleventh Central Committee of the Communist Party
of China, my country systematically cleaned up past "Left" mistakes,
which triggered two trends of thought within the party and society: one
believed that the Party Central Committee rejected Mao Zedong and violated Mao
Zedong Thought; the other believed that , Mao Zedong and Mao Zedong Thought
must be completely negated. In the face of these two trends of thought, Deng
Xiaoping proposed that at an appropriate time, the Party Central Committee
should make a resolution on the experience and lessons after the founding of
New China, and make an evaluation of that period of history. He advocated that
in drafting this resolution, on the one hand, it is necessary to conduct a
realistic analysis of Mao Zedong’s mistakes in his later years; on the other
hand, it is necessary to distinguish this mistake from Mao Zedong Thought. and
develop Mao Zedong Thought.
Chen
Yun fully agreed with Deng Xiaoping's proposition. He said to the drafting
team: "Comrade Xiaoping proposed that the "Resolution" should be
thick rather than detailed. I agree. Under this principle, if it is an achievement,
write the achievement, and if it is a mistake, write the mistake."
"The "Resolution" must follow Comrade Xiaoping's opinion,
establish Comrade Mao Zedong's historical status, and uphold and develop Mao
Zedong Thought."
In
order for the "Resolution" to fully reflect Deng Xiaoping's
intentions, Chen Yun also proposed to add a paragraph reviewing the 28-year
history of the Communist Party of China before the founding of New China in the
"Resolution", saying that if written in this way, "Comrade Mao
Zedong's achievements and contributions will be greatly reduced." To
summarize more comprehensively, to establish Comrade Mao Zedong’s historical
status, and to uphold and develop Mao Zedong Thought, there is a comprehensive
basis; to say that Comrade Mao Zedong’s achievements are the first, and that
mistakes are second, and that Mao Zedong Thought guides us to achieve Victory
is more convincing."
For
this suggestion, Deng Xiaoping appreciated it very much, saying that Chen Yun's
"this opinion is very good" and "is a very important
opinion".
Thanks
to the close cooperation of Deng Xiaoping and Chen Yun, the
"Resolution" was finally passed at the Sixth Plenary Session of the
Eleventh Central Committee of the Communist Party of China after more than a
year of drafting and discussion by more than 4,000 people. Look ahead.
After
smashing the Gang of Four, Deng Xiaoping and Chen Yun are the only remaining
core members of the first-generation leadership of the CCP. For example, the
confrontation between the two peaks constitutes the dual core of the
second-generation leadership core of the CCP. Two-headed politics, two-peak
politics, are rare in China, which has a tradition that one mountain cannot
accommodate two tigers. Deng Xiaoping and Chen Yun were evenly matched, checking
and balancing each other, neither could overthrow the other, and neither could
do without the other. Some major issues require the consent of both of them to
work. Therefore, the political power in China's reform era was in a state of
bimodality. Since Deng Xiaoping is actually the top leader, this mountain is
slightly higher. Deng Xiaoping's team included Hu Yaobang, Zhao Ziyang, Wan Li,
Hu Qili, Xi Zhongxun, Li Chang, Zhou Yang, Qiao Shi, Xiang Nan, Ren Zhongyi,
Tian Jiyun and a large number of cadres who supported the reform. Chen Yun's
team included Li Xiannian, Song Renqiong, Yao Yilin, Song Ping, Wang Zhen, Yu
Qiuli, Hu Qiaomu, Deng Liqun and other leftists, as well as several party and
state veterans.
After
Mao Zedong's death, China had two pressing problems: economic poverty and
political dictatorship. The solution to these two problems is the reform of the
economic system and the reform of the political system. After the death of Mao
Zedong, four political forces tried to choose the future path of China
according to their own wishes.
The
first option is to maintain the line of Mao Zedong in his later years both
politically and economically, that is, to continue the revolution and the
planned economic system under the dictatorship of the proletariat. Before Mao
Zedong's death, Jiang Qing and others regarded themselves as Mao Zedong's
successors. They were active supporters of the "Cultural Revolution"
and the theory of continuing revolution under the dictatorship of the
proletariat.
The
smashing of the "Gang of Four" greatly weakened the political forces
that adhered to the "theory of continuing revolution under the
dictatorship of the proletariat". We must affirm that the smashing of the
"Gang of Four" brought a breakthrough and major impact on Chinese
history, but those who smashed the "Gang of Four" do not necessarily
all oppose the "theory of continued revolution under the dictatorship of
the proletariat", let alone the planned economy system. In February 1977,
Hua Guofeng stated that "we will firmly support all the decisions made by
Chairman Mao. We will unswervingly follow all the instructions of Chairman
Mao". In May 1977, he published the article "Continuing the
Revolution Under the Dictatorship of the Proletariat to the End - Studying the Fifth
Volume" in the "People's Daily" (People's Daily, May 1, 1977).
This shows that Hua Guofeng insists on the first option.
Obviously,
this choice could not solve the problems of poverty and dictatorship that China
urgently needed to solve at that time, and thus went against the needs of the
times. After the unremitting struggle of the reform forces represented by Deng
Xiaoping, the "two whatevers" were criticized and Hua Guofeng was
forced to step down. Wang Dongxing, Wu De, Ji Dengkui, Chen Xilian, Li Xin, Guo
Yufeng and other "everything faction" are also known as Birds and
Beasts. Political forces insisting on the first option have failed. However,
they still have some supporters, and their ideological influence still exists,
and their influence is attached to the second option, sometimes becoming the
second option's allies.
The
second option is to adhere to the socialist system, the original ideology, the
leadership of the Communist Party of China and the dictatorship of the
proletariat politically; and follow the path of the 1950s economically. People
who hold this attitude advocate: abandon the line of Mao Zedong's later years
and return to the 1950s. They believe that the first five-year plan was
successful, but the "Great Leap Forward" was ruined, and the
"Four Cleansing" and "Cultural Revolution" followed later,
so that the planned economy had no chance to do well. There is nothing wrong
with the planned economy, it is just that it has not been implemented well. Of
course, in the 1950s, the state-owned economy was too concentrated and unified,
and no certain territory was set aside for the development of diversified
operations and small-scale production. Therefore, they advocate that under the
premise of the planned economy system, a little market regulation is allowed,
which means "the planned economy is the mainstay, and the market
regulation is the supplement." Chen Yun is the representative of this
proposition. "Selected Works of Chen Yun" published in the early days
of the reform embodies this idea.
The
third option is to adhere to the socialist system politically, adhere to the
original ideology, adhere to the leadership of the Communist Party of China and
the dictatorship of the proletariat; and abandon the planned economic system
economically. Take market-oriented reforms. Those who hold this view believe
that going back to the 1950s is not an option. They have a deeper understanding
of the drawbacks of the planned economic system. But at the beginning of the
reform, no one dared to propose abandoning the planned economic system, nor
explicitly proposed to implement a market economy. It only emphasizes the
development of the commodity economy and the establishment of an economic
system compatible with the commodity economy. It was not until the mid-1980s
that it was clearly proposed that the reform should be
"market-oriented", and it was not until the early 1990s that the
"socialist market economy" was proposed.
Deng
Xiaoping is the representative of this idea. In November 1979, when Deng
Xiaoping met with Gibney, vice chairman of the editorial board of Encyclopedia
Britannica Publishing Company, and others, he clearly raised the issue of
planned economy and market economy. He said: "It is definitely not correct
to say that a market economy only exists in a capitalist society. Why can't
socialism have a market economy? This cannot be called capitalism." But
this conversation lasted until 1992, 13 years later. just announced.
The
fourth option is to abandon the planned economic system economically and
develop a market economy; politically abandon the dictatorship of the
proletariat and realize political democratization. That's liberal democrats.
This is a relatively thorough reform proposition, and it is also a way of
thinking that hopes to fundamentally solve China's problems. In the early days
of the reform, this kind of view was outrageous. Therefore, no one in the
mainstream and within the system made such a claim. However, among the people
and intellectuals, this kind of view exists. More importantly, in foreign
countries, whether in Western countries or post-transition Soviet (Soviet)
Eastern (European) countries, this view is the mainstream thought of society.
They find their own space of expression in support of the third option, and
sometimes become allies of the third option.
The
political struggle in China's reform era was actually a contest between the
above four political forces. When the curtain of reform was about to kick off,
the central content of the political struggle was that the latter three
political forces combined into one force to oppose the first force, namely
smashing the "Gang of Four" and overthrowing the "Anything
faction." The "Gang of Four" has been smashed, and the
"Anything faction" has been driven out of the center of power, so the
first option has lost its possibility. The power of the fourth option is still
on the fringes, with no say in national affairs. It can only show the existence
of its power when there is a student riot. Therefore, the political struggle
mainly takes place between the second option and the third option. These two
kinds of forces are both in the center of power, and both occupy more social
resources and more supporters.
These
four options bring together four political forces. The series of these four
forces can form China's political spectrum from left to right. On the far left
are the remnants of the "Gang of Four", and on the far right are the
liberal democrats.
on this
continuum of the political spectrum. There are two places with the strongest energy,
which are the third choice represented by Deng Xiaoping and the second choice
represented by Chen Yun. Chen Yun was elected as a member of the Central
Committee at the Fourth Plenary Session of the Sixth Central Committee of the
Communist Party of China in 1931. When the Provisional Political Bureau of the
Central Committee of the Communist Party of China was established in September
of the same year, he was already a member of the Political Bureau. In 1935, on
the Long March, he was sent to the Soviet Union to report the situation to the
Communist International. In November 1937, he returned to Yan'an with Wang
Ming, Kang Sheng and others. In the Yan'an era, he was in charge of
organizational work, so he has a solid foundation in the cadre team. At the
beginning of the founding of the Communist Party of China, the leaders of the
central government were ranked as follows: Mao, Liu, Zhou, Zhu, Chen, Lin, and
Deng. Chen Yun's status is still higher than Deng Xiaoping's. 49 years later,
whenever there was a setback in the economy, Chen Yun was asked to come out to
clean up the situation. Mao Zedong said, "When the country is in trouble,
I think of a good general, and when the family is poor, I think of a good
wife." When Mao Zedong criticized "anti-rash advance", he and
Zhou Enlai were criticized at the same time. Most people who supported Zhou
Enlai also supported Chen Yun. In the national economic management system, in
the cadre organization system and high-level cadres, Chen Yun can be said to
have deep roots and respond to everyone. Because of his deep thinking,
stability, rigor, soft outside and strong inside, he has won the trust of many
people. He rarely directly participates in political struggles, giving people a
sense of mystery.
Deng
Xiaoping is also a figure with deep roots and deep roots in the Communist Party
of China. He dared to act boldly and made decisive decisions. He was known as
the "Steel Company". After the "Gang of Four", he was a
recognized leader in the party. He is in charge of the army and controls the
overall situation. Due to his ups and downs of political experience, his
position is unshakable.
Deng
Xiaoping and Chen Yun were evenly matched, checking and balancing each other,
neither could overthrow the other, and neither could do without the other. Some
major issues require the consent of both of them to work. Deng Xiaoping and
Chen Yun have different styles. Deng Xiaoping was a man with a strong hand,
while Chen Yun often judged people with the mean. Everyone clapped their hands
and applauded the handling of the "Gang of Four" issue in the manner
of a palace coup. Chen Yun said that this method "is not an example".
During the trial of the "Gang of Four", Deng Xiaoping advocated the
shooting of Jiang Qing and Zhang Chunqiao. Chen Yun said: "If I vote
against it, it must be recorded." For the four elderly people far away,
some people advocated expulsion from the party, but Chen Yun ensured that the
four of them passed the test. Chen Yun is fundamentally leftist, but he uses
the appearance of the mean to pack the inner core of the leftist. In his
struggle with Deng Xiaoping, he often used softness to overcome rigidity. On
the positive side, under China's highly centralized political system, two-peak
politics is better than one-peak politics. With Chen Yun's checks and balances,
Deng Xiaoping was prevented from abusing power to a certain extent.
With
these two peaks of power, two teams come together. Deng Xiaoping's team
included Hu Yaobang, Zhao Ziyang, Wan Li, Hu Qili, Xi Zhongxun, Li Chang, Zhou
Yang, Qiao Shi, Xiang Nan, Ren Zhongyi, Tian Jiyun and a large number of cadres
who supported the reform. Chen Yun's team included Li Xiannian, Song Renqiong,
Yao Yilin, Song Ping, Wang Zhen, Yu Qiuli, Hu Qiaomu, Deng Liqun and other
leftists, as well as several party and state veterans. The Chen Yun Front can
also be called the Conservatives, and the Deng Xiaoping Front can also be
called the Reformers.
Deng
Xiaoping's Front and Chen Yun's Front have two points of consensus: one is to
insist that China's original political system and guiding ideology cannot be
changed; the other is to change the economic status quo left by Mao Zedong,
that is, economic system reform.
In
1987, according to Deng Xiaoping's intention, Zhao Ziyang summed up the consensus
of the two fronts as "one center, two basic points", and the
Thirteenth Congress raised this summation to the height of "the party's
basic line". "One center" means "centering on economic
construction"; "two basic points" are "reform and opening
up" and "four basic principles". These two basic points can be
expressed in another form: do not change China's existing political system, and
learn from Western economic systems. This is the modern version of the
"Chinese learning for the body and Western learning for application"
put forward by Chinese reformers more than a hundred years ago.
Two
basic points, one is to realize the "commodity economy", "market
economy" and "material stimulus" that have been regarded as
heretical in the past few decades, and actively absorb "imperialist
capital export"; Adhere to the basic system, basic position and basic
theory of the Communist Party for decades. This is difficult to coordinate in
actual work. It is impossible not to collide between two incompatible fundamental
points. China's reform process is a process of constant collision of two basic
points.
Under
the banner of "two basic points", two teams gathered: one team
emphasized reform and opening up, and the other team emphasized the four basic
principles. The former team is basically people from Deng Xiaoping's front, and
the latter team is basically from Chen Yun's front. As far as reform and
opening up is concerned, there are differences between the two fronts, one is
the planned economy and the other is the market economy. But this divisive
struggle is mingled with a struggle on two fundamental points.
For
example, Chen Yun's front used the "Four Cardinal Principles" as a
weapon when attacking Deng Xiaoping's front. Deng Xiaoping's front used
"opposition to reform" as a weapon when attacking Chen Yun's front.
If the Chen Yun Front thinks that a certain reform of the Deng Xiaoping Front
has gone too far, they will take up the weapon of "surname capital and
surname society" to attack.
The
collision of two basic points under the twin peaks politics has evolved into a
political struggle between two forces. In the struggle of these two forces. The
remnants of the "everything faction" supported Chen Yun's front; the
liberal democrats supported Deng Xiaoping's front. When the activities of the
liberal democrats threatened the "Four Cardinal Principles," the Deng
Xiaoping Front and the Chen Yun Front joined forces to suppress them.
For the
"Deng Hu Zhao system" formed by the 12th National Congress of the
Communist Party of China, Chen Yun's front is incompatible. It can be said that
the "Deng Hu Zhao system" and the "Chen Yun front" are the
two ends of the political struggle after the 12th National Congress of the
Communist Party of China. In the end, the "Deng Hu Zhao system" was
disintegrated. In this round of struggle, Chen Yun's front won. The defeat of
Deng Xiaoping's front came at the expense of two general secretaries. After
1992, the socialist market economy became the goal of China's reforms, and the
planned economic system was completely abandoned. It can be said that Deng
Xiaoping's front won and Chen Yun's front lost, at the cost of giving up their
own chosen goals.
Group psychological exploration novel (Shenyang)
回复删除Today is like a crow gathering, and tomorrow will disappear like a beast. This is the case for hooligans, politicians, and ignorance people. Today, you can mix together, and will run counter to the benefit tomorrow. I explore the novels of group psychology, hoping that more people in the world can wake up from nightmares.