125
In the morning, a ray of golden sunlight shone on
the yard, and the crowing of the rooster resounded through the sky nearby,
pulling Chai Jianhua out of his nightmare.
After breakfast, Chai Jianhua and Pan Guangfu left
the yard to go for a walk in the fields.
There are countless rapeseed flowers in front of
you, a large piece, and you can't see the side, as if the earth is covered with
a yellow carpet.
Chai Jianhua and Pan Guangfu continued to chat
about the anti-rightist struggle.
Chai Jianhua asked Pan Guangfu: Are anti-rightists
and the so-called "expansion" just "mistakes"? I can always
see this statement in party media and some expert articles. You have worked as
a reporter for the Hong Kong media, so I don't know what the foreign media
think.
Pan Guangfu said bluntly:
For the grassroots cadres of the majority of the
party, there may be "mistakes"; for the perpetrators, since they
publicly claimed to be "conspiracy", it was not out of inadvertence.
In fact, Mao Zedong, as the initiator and leader of all previous national
political movements, almost all included the elimination of a few
"dissidents" elements to form a national movement, so as to form the
illusion of class struggle and line struggle to cover up the party's inner
struggle. power struggle.
The anti-rightist campaign in 1957 was mainly aimed
at crushing the democratic parties who dared to challenge the leadership of the
Communist Party, especially the so-called "right-wing" members of the
Democratic League and democrats and liberal intellectuals inside and outside
the Communist Party.
The Lushan Conference in 1959 was originally caused
by Mao Zedong's dissatisfaction with the stable forces in the party represented
by Peng Dehuai who challenged his absolute authority of "wiseness and
correctness". The right-leaning line struggle, everyone reviews and
criticizes, is also used to cover up personal grievances and power contests
with Boss Peng, and to transfer the heavy responsibility for his failure in the
"Great Leap Forward". My father was beaten as a rightist just because
he said a few words of justice for Peng Dehuai. He is the principal of a
primary school, and he has nothing to do with Generalissimo Peng Dehuai!
Pan Guangfu continued:
The Cultural Revolution was also mainly aimed at
overthrowing Liu Shaoqi and other "Khrushchev-style figures" who
threatened his authoritarian status. However, it started by sweeping out
peripheral forces, criticizing Wu Han and Deng Tuo, and overthrowing "Peng
Luo Lu Yang" as the opening ceremony. The gongs and drums created an
illusion that "one class overthrew one class" instead of one person
overthrowing another group of people, causing an unprecedented "great
revolution", and finally put Liu Shaoqi, Peng Dehuai, He Long and other founding
fathers to death. These can be said to be conspiracy, because most of them are
carried out openly in broad daylight, and personal dictatorship is wrapped in
nice-sounding "line struggle", "class struggle",
"cultural revolution" and even "great democracy", "
The cloak of the dictatorship of the masses". It is difficult for ordinary
people to fathom the conspiracy behind his conspiracy.
Specific to the analysis of the ins and outs of the
anti-rightist "yang conspiracy", the conspiracy behind it is by no
means a simple summary of "leading a snake out of a hole".
Chai Jianhua asked Pan Guangfu again: "How can
we correctly evaluate the anti-rightist struggle?"
Pan Guangfu said: So far, most of the views and
evaluations on anti-rightism are based on anti-rightism. Regarding the
rectification and release of anti-rightism in the previous stage, they only
regard it as mainly setting traps and leading snakes out of their holes.
However, it ignores Mao Zedong’s original purpose of rectification and the
release itself; it also somewhat deifies Mao Zedong’s anti-rightist foresight
and clever calculations; moreover, he ignores the standpoint of the people and
the perspective of constitutionalism. Let's make a historical evaluation of
this first great democratic movement in New China.
Pan Guangfu also said: As for the
"necessity" of "anti-rightist movement", if we look at it
from the standpoint of Mao Zedong's maintenance of personal absolute authority
and his dictatorship system, in the face of Luo Longji, Chu Anping, democratic
liberal intellectuals' opposition to the "Party World" It is of
course "necessary" to repel their "offensive"; and from the
perspective of the constitutional government of people's democracy, it is also
necessary for those who are falsely accused of being "rightists" to
fight for democracy and anti-authoritarianism. necessary. I personally think
that the anti-rightist movement is a reaction against democracy, not only
unnecessary, but also a major crime of violating the constitution.
Chai Jianhua was speechless again.
The two walked silently along the path, which
twisted and stretched forward. There is a small river at the end of the path.
In the field, the sounds of frogs and insects come and go, "croaking"
and "buzzing", louder than louder.
没有评论:
发表评论