我的简介

我的照片
作家、摄影家、民间文艺家

2023年5月7日星期日

Wake up(125)

 


125

 

In the morning, a ray of golden sunlight shone on the yard, and the crowing of the rooster resounded through the sky nearby, pulling Chai Jianhua out of his nightmare.

After breakfast, Chai Jianhua and Pan Guangfu left the yard to go for a walk in the fields.

There are countless rapeseed flowers in front of you, a large piece, and you can't see the side, as if the earth is covered with a yellow carpet.

Chai Jianhua and Pan Guangfu continued to chat about the anti-rightist struggle.

Chai Jianhua asked Pan Guangfu: Are anti-rightists and the so-called "expansion" just "mistakes"? I can always see this statement in party media and some expert articles. You have worked as a reporter for the Hong Kong media, so I don't know what the foreign media think.

Pan Guangfu said bluntly:

For the grassroots cadres of the majority of the party, there may be "mistakes"; for the perpetrators, since they publicly claimed to be "conspiracy", it was not out of inadvertence. In fact, Mao Zedong, as the initiator and leader of all previous national political movements, almost all included the elimination of a few "dissidents" elements to form a national movement, so as to form the illusion of class struggle and line struggle to cover up the party's inner struggle. power struggle.

The anti-rightist campaign in 1957 was mainly aimed at crushing the democratic parties who dared to challenge the leadership of the Communist Party, especially the so-called "right-wing" members of the Democratic League and democrats and liberal intellectuals inside and outside the Communist Party.

The Lushan Conference in 1959 was originally caused by Mao Zedong's dissatisfaction with the stable forces in the party represented by Peng Dehuai who challenged his absolute authority of "wiseness and correctness". The right-leaning line struggle, everyone reviews and criticizes, is also used to cover up personal grievances and power contests with Boss Peng, and to transfer the heavy responsibility for his failure in the "Great Leap Forward". My father was beaten as a rightist just because he said a few words of justice for Peng Dehuai. He is the principal of a primary school, and he has nothing to do with Generalissimo Peng Dehuai!

Pan Guangfu continued:

The Cultural Revolution was also mainly aimed at overthrowing Liu Shaoqi and other "Khrushchev-style figures" who threatened his authoritarian status. However, it started by sweeping out peripheral forces, criticizing Wu Han and Deng Tuo, and overthrowing "Peng Luo Lu Yang" as the opening ceremony. The gongs and drums created an illusion that "one class overthrew one class" instead of one person overthrowing another group of people, causing an unprecedented "great revolution", and finally put Liu Shaoqi, Peng Dehuai, He Long and other founding fathers to death. These can be said to be conspiracy, because most of them are carried out openly in broad daylight, and personal dictatorship is wrapped in nice-sounding "line struggle", "class struggle", "cultural revolution" and even "great democracy", " The cloak of the dictatorship of the masses". It is difficult for ordinary people to fathom the conspiracy behind his conspiracy.

Specific to the analysis of the ins and outs of the anti-rightist "yang conspiracy", the conspiracy behind it is by no means a simple summary of "leading a snake out of a hole".

Chai Jianhua asked Pan Guangfu again: "How can we correctly evaluate the anti-rightist struggle?"

Pan Guangfu said: So far, most of the views and evaluations on anti-rightism are based on anti-rightism. Regarding the rectification and release of anti-rightism in the previous stage, they only regard it as mainly setting traps and leading snakes out of their holes. However, it ignores Mao Zedong’s original purpose of rectification and the release itself; it also somewhat deifies Mao Zedong’s anti-rightist foresight and clever calculations; moreover, he ignores the standpoint of the people and the perspective of constitutionalism. Let's make a historical evaluation of this first great democratic movement in New China.

Pan Guangfu also said: As for the "necessity" of "anti-rightist movement", if we look at it from the standpoint of Mao Zedong's maintenance of personal absolute authority and his dictatorship system, in the face of Luo Longji, Chu Anping, democratic liberal intellectuals' opposition to the "Party World" It is of course "necessary" to repel their "offensive"; and from the perspective of the constitutional government of people's democracy, it is also necessary for those who are falsely accused of being "rightists" to fight for democracy and anti-authoritarianism. necessary. I personally think that the anti-rightist movement is a reaction against democracy, not only unnecessary, but also a major crime of violating the constitution.

Chai Jianhua was speechless again.

The two walked silently along the path, which twisted and stretched forward. There is a small river at the end of the path. In the field, the sounds of frogs and insects come and go, "croaking" and "buzzing", louder than louder.

 

没有评论:

发表评论