374
During
the gathering at the Cafe Bau restaurant in Hong Kong, Wan Ru asked teachers
and friends a series of questions and answers about current social issues. The
topic of small talk suddenly became lively.
Professor
Shen Zhirui said: In terms of the prosperity of singing and dancing, the
prosperous scene is only whitewashed after Pooh came to power. The most obvious
one is the Spring Festival Gala. After Pooh came to power, the Spring Festival
Gala has become more and more boring every year. Doctrine is empty.
Professor
Hong Wenxuan said: Before the Hu-Wen era, there was SARS, and then there was
the Wenchuan Earthquake. But at that time the Internet was not as developed as
it is now, the wall was not as high as it is now, and Google hadn’t left the
mainland. At that time, forums were popular, and there was indeed a relatively
loose network environment for discussing national affairs and social conflicts.
Public knowledge was still toe-to-toe at that time. High-spirited. I remember
that someone petitioned and met Wen Jiabao at that time. If you think about it
now, you have just left the house and you will have to eat the iron fist of
maintaining stability before you leave the market.
Professor
Shen Zhirui said: Regarding nationalism, during the Hu-Wen period, the policy
of making a fortune with a muffled voice was actually implemented all the time,
keeping a low profile and not causing trouble, so it did not stir up national
sentiments, but devoted itself to keeping secrets from Hong Kong, Taiwan and
overseas. Infiltration, this move is much better than cockroaches and red dung.
Unfortunately, the level of doctorate in elementary school is too low, so many
years of hard work have been wasted with one move.
Shen
Haidong said:
I am
really puzzled. When "Pin Cong" mentioned a recent trend, comparing
the topics of different periods within the CCP, it must be "total
negation, no comparison, all bullshit" to be considered correct.
When it
comes to being an official, civil servants, journalists, lawyers, and
professors who come from within the system, it is only true that they are all
"running dog true colors, especially shameless".
When it
comes to social openness, freedom of speech, and the construction of the rule
of law, it is only correct to insist that "from 1949 to now, there is only
one virtue."
I dare
to ask this kind of discussion, this kind of view of history, is it considered
extreme left? Is it frame-limited thinking? Does it count as upper-level
determinism?
Qin
Xiling said:
You
have no data comparison, no case support, no fact comparison, and no situation
analysis. You are all subjective and arbitrary. How is this different from the
Communist Party? If "Pin Cong" is a forum for spraying communism, it
only provides an opportunity to get addicted to the mouth and evaluate the
dissatisfaction in life in a non-objective way, then many discussions are
meaningless.
No. 9
document, 7 do not talk about, mass arrests, 16 articles, all the way to the
Hong Kong National Security Law. Or diminished, what can be disputed?
Zhou
Yuzhong said that from 2008 to 2011, compared with 2015 to 2018, foreign
exchange reserves decreased by 60%, M2 growth exceeded 430% year-on-year, all
fiscal revenues of 30 first-level administrative divisions except Shanghai
turned negative, and the per capita debt ratio increased by 56%. The
year-on-year growth rate has increased by more than 1 percentage point, and the
per capita disposable income has remained basically unchanged. Is there any
dispute about which government is more embellished by singing and dancing?
During the Hu Jintao government in Xiamen, Fujian, Guangdong, Zhejiang and
other places, factories could only let workers go on the 29th day of the lunar
calendar before Chinese New Year's Eve. The boss wanted to squat at the door
with a big shovel to fear that the workers would go home. The factories under
Xi Jinping returned to their hometowns one after another after October 1st, and
more factories used only permanent skilled workers, and outsourced contract
teams for other workers. During the Hu-Wen era, you could report on demolition,
sweatshops, black mines, and productivity moths. There is a flood in the Pooh
era, and you have to wait for the top to report the caliber. What made the
world even more astonished was that Pooh never went to the front line of the
disaster area to condolences to the grassroots affected by the disaster. Is
this called "people first, life first"?
Shen
Haidong said: In the past, Weibo, Zhihu, and various forums, how many people
were convicted for their words? At that time, Weibo’s ranking of the public’s
background was at the forefront, and countless big Vs were not even
anti-communist themselves, and they had to curse in order to attract fans.
At that
time, people like He Weifang, Zi Zhongyun, and Ren Zhiqiang were still on
Weibo, and there was no need for people like Chen Qiushi to use themselves as a
body punching bag.
At that
time, the southern department dared to directly satirize Pooh in "Dayu
Controls the Water", and the editor-in-chief did not say that he would be
sentenced to 18 years.
At that
time, Taiwanese athletes, Chinese American Navy, and Hong Kong progressive
politicians all made their voices heard on Weibo.
Zhou
Yuzhong said: If this kind of comparison cannot be judged rationally, if
self-anesthesia leads to a conclusion of "it's not going backwards, it
turns out to be so bad", then there is no need to discuss the so-called
social progress theory and democratic reform in this forum , Change it to the
Obscene Tuzhi Forum, it’s nothing more than bragging, right?
Shen
Haidong said: Venting and cursing are good for occasional, just like pure
theory, as Montesquieu said every now and then, you can't curse a Communist
Party to death with this thing. It is a more responsible and most feasible path
to objectively recognize the environment we exist in, compare various historical
stages, learn knowledge and lessons from it, look for opportunities, and
reserve for the future.
Professor
Shen Zhirui said: Speech control in the Hu Jintao era was also relatively
strict, but it was far better than it is now. At that time, some netizens were
detained for making inappropriate remarks about national leaders, and the
society was far from "singing and dancing". level. But it is true
that negative news can be published inside the wall. Thanks to these news, the
people inside the wall have a relatively clear understanding of the country and
society. But recognizing social conflicts does not mean that social conflicts
can be resolved. There may not be fewer conflicts than now. In other words, the
social conflicts in China today are a continuation of the contradictions in the
Hu-Wen era.
Professor
Hong Wenxuan said: Pooh’s attempts to cover up and divert social conflicts when
he came to power have indeed aggravated social conflicts, and the brainwashing
patriotic propaganda against the public has also produced more wolf fighters.
The situation of foreign aggression. To put it bluntly, it is not advisable to
miss the era before Pooh, because the essence of Chinese politics and the
ruling party lies there, but the Hu-Wen era is indeed much better than the
present, because there are hopeful countries and hopeless countries It is
indeed a world of difference.
Nan
Yangsheng said: I have read He Qinglian's Twitter record: Tweet friends to
remember the era of Hu and Wen. This article records the true stories that
happened on Twitter, and hundreds of tweeters describe China ten years ago
based on their own understanding of the Hu-Wen era. Seemingly trivial, there
are only a dozen summaries that summarize the overall situation, but it
completes a jigsaw puzzle of the times, which involves cognitive gaps in the
information age, incomplete information under information control, and readers'
self-selection under massive information. level problem. At first I didn’t pay
attention, but later I found out that someone started from their own experience
and described the era of Hu and Wen very well. I was curious for a while and
read more than 600 comments and dozens of quotes. With the cognition of
reality, we have really entered the era of "A Thousand Hamlets".
Professor
Shen Zhirui said: The Hu-Wen period was a relatively enlightened period in the
past 40 years. The scale of speech was relatively loose. The vast majority of
people had the freedom to move. A little wealth, and more importantly, not
tossing and tossing gave the vast majority of people a chance to breathe. Apart
from corruption, officials still have a bottom line of awe. Now, these most
basic things have disappeared without a trace.
Professor
Hong Wenxuan said: "The speeches in the Hu-Wen era were far less free than
those in the Jiang era. The economy developed rapidly due to joining the WTO,
but the decade of Hu-Wen was the decade of the rich and powerful. Public
murders are common all over the country, there are officials who are robbed,
social security is also a mess, many policemen are the umbrella of the local
underworld, but now Pooh has done too badly in the past two years."
The old
dean Bai Yu said: The three points mentioned by He Qinglian are actually 90% of
the political and social conditions in China at that time. The evaluation of
official corruption is indeed completely different. I do not agree with the
statement that "officials have a bottom line of awe in addition to
corruption". What's more interesting is that some of us now unconsciously
compare Hu and Wen with the Pooh era. In terms of freedom of speech, only the
strict control of the Pooh era was compared, and no comparison was made with
the relative looseness of the Toad era. I would like to add two points:
Opposing color revolutions, cleaning up foreign NGOs in China, and Wu Bangguo,
chairman of the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress, proposed
the five no-doings are all things of the Hu-Wen era. From the inside of the
CCP, the Hu-Wen era was a time of flood control in Nine Dragons, and the status
of the nine Standing Committee members was relatively equal, more like
colleagues; the two-term Standing Committee members in the Pooh era, the
relationship with the other six people is more like the relationship between half
an emperor and the Military Aircraft Department. It is precisely because of the
disciplinary inspection and supervision departments of the Hu-Wen era and the
family of the supervised cat and mouse that Bo Xilai had the political action
of singing red and fighting gangsters to accumulate prestige for himself and
gaining fame. It is also because of his Chongqing anti-corruption campaign that
Abandoned by higher-ups with decision-making power. This is a cognitive gap
determined by social class status, and this gap will exist regardless of any
society or era.
Professor
Shen Zhirui said:
The ten
years of Hu and Wen were from 2003 to 2012. At that time, China was entering
the WTO not long ago, and the Olympic Games was held in 2008. The United
States’ policy toward China since the 1980s was contact, cooperation,
influence, and change. This stage is in the period of cooperation and
influence. During the period of trying to change, more than a thousand NGOs
were dispatched, established, and supported in China, most of which were
environmental protection and health care, and very few were promoting civil
rights. The Chinese authorities regarded these NGOs as the means of the West's
"color revolution" in China. tool. Driven by external forces, China
has entered a time when public intellectuals, democracy and rights defenders
are very active. But some people think that this is "the most corrupt and
incompetent decade, the most terrifying decade when interest groups carve up
resources and plunder national wealth, the worst decade in which the West
brainwashed Chinese people, and of course it is also the most active decade in
public knowledge and public teasing."
Professor
Hong Wenxuan said: But many promoters affirmed the relatively loose social
space of that era. It is believed that in that era, public intellectuals
outside the system began to appear, including lawyers, journalists and media
practitioners, writers and some entrepreneurs. They began to pay attention to
environmental protection and smog, exposed waste oil, black coal kilns, fake
vaccines, and poisoned milk powder, questioned China's labor education system,
deportation system for blind migrants, and exposed the inhumane family planning
system. It was an era of awakening public opinion, and the Chinese realized
that they were individuals, not slaves of the state.
Shen
Haidong said: I read information on the Internet, and it is generally believed
that the social space in the Hu-Wen era was looser than that in the Xi era. The
Deng Yujiao case was at that time. Although there were injustices, people from
all over the country rallied in support of Deng Yujiao, but the people who
rallied were not suppressed. There are also netizens who look deeper. For
example, some view is: "Openness is an appearance, but it is actually
because of the rapid development of social media, such as forums, blogs, Q
groups, and video sites. The government's censorship has not kept up. At that
time, a popular saying "Attention is power, and watching changes
China." At that time, there were many social incidents, such as Sanlu, 70
yards, Yaojiaxin, Qian Yunhui, Wenchuan, Sun Zhigang, Tang Fuzhen, Yang Jia,
Xia Junfeng, Wukan, Lvba, etc., but The enthusiasm of the people to participate
in the public discussion also brings hope."
Zhou
Yuzhong said, I personally think that the Hu-Wen era is an era in which both
good and bad coexist, vitality and decay coexist. The era of Hu and Wen was the
most prosperous era of high-end restaurants and nightclubs, the era of high-end
tobacco, wine, tea and health care products, the era when public officials did
not go home to eat seven days a week, and the era when many businessmen felt
that business was the best. This is the era of huge overseas investment blood
loss and money laundering, and it is also the era when many officials and
businessmen's families profited out! Some people also said on the Internet that
the Hu-Wen era was an era when patriotism was about to be socially killed. I'm
talking about what's seen.
Qin
Xiling sighed: Many tweeters talked about food safety, Blind Mountain
(trafficking of women), Blind Well (trafficking of slave labor), Sanlu milk
powder, gutter oil... and Chai Jing's documentary on environmental pollution. I
also felt that it was chaotic at that time, but because the speech environment
was relatively relaxed, these incidents could be reported in the newspapers. To
be honest, none of these things have been resolved until today, it's just that
you don't even know it! Now it is just that there is no freedom of speech on
the basis of the chaos at the beginning.
Nan
Yangsheng smiled: NO, that era was also full of collapses, such as dolls with
poisonous milk, derailed trains, and various money corruptions, but ordinary
people could at least get a share of it, and they could scold the government
and leaders on the Internet. What now? The common people don't even have these
things. Although the Hu-Wen era was not so good, Pooh is even more terrifying.
He wants to restore and go back! It can be said that the sound of the waves is
still there.
Group psychological exploration novel (Shenyang)
回复删除Today is like a crow gathering, and tomorrow will disappear like a beast. This is the case for hooligans, politicians, and ignorance people. Today, you can mix together, and will run counter to the benefit tomorrow. I explore the novels of group psychology, hoping that more people in the world can wake up from nightmares.